BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
8 September 2006 A New Moustache Wasp in Dominican Amber, with an Account of Apoid Wasp Evolution Emphasizing Crabroninae (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae)
DANIEL J BENNETT, MICHAEL S ENGEL
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A new, extinct species of the wasp genus Lindenius (Crabroninae: Crabronini: Crabronina) is described and figured from two exquisitely preserved specimens discovered in Early Miocene Dominican amber. Lindenius paleomystax, new species, represents the first record for the tribe Crabronini in Dominican amber and the southernmost record for the genus in the New World. The unique locality and habitat data begin to reveal a more complicated natural history for the genus than that suggested by Recent taxa alone. A checklist of fossil apoid wasps in amber is provided and the new species is discussed within the context of an overview of apoid wasp origins and evolution.

Introduction

Apoid wasps of the subtribe Crabronina, or “moustache wasps”, are rarely discovered as amber inclusions, despite the worldwide occurrence of numerous wood- or twig-nesting species. Most species occur in more xeric environments, areas outside of the tropical or subtropical forests producing amber, and many nest in soil. As such, the rarity of moustache wasps in amber can be at least partially explained by habitat preferences. Nonetheless, a significant variety of forest-loving groups that nest in various plant materials in tropical and temperate areas exists, and thus the problem of fully understanding why these wasps are rare in amber remains. In the search for an explanation, note that ground-nesting is the primitive condition for the subtribe (Bohart and Menke, 1976) and that to a large extent wood- and twig-nesting habits are found among the most diverse genera, such as Ectemnius, Rhopalum, and Crossocerus. If these are derived groups representing recent radiations into niches formerly unused by moustache wasps, then the paucity of these wasps in fossiliferous resins could be explained by habitat preferences in combination with fundamental nesting differences between modern and prehistoric faunas. Whether such speculation can be developed into a supported hypothesis awaits a formal cladistic analysis of the Crabronina (under way by D.J.B.) and a more precise understanding of the evolution of nesting behavior in the subtribe.

Prior to this report, two species of the genus Tracheliodes described by Cockerell (1909) from Baltic amber were the only representatives of the subtribe known from fossiliferous resin (table 1). However, given that Cockerell did not describe the relative position of the eyes in these specimens (note that an important character of Tracheliodes is widely separated eyes ventrally), his generic assignments must be treated with caution (W.J. Pulawski, personal commun.). Compression fossils of Crabronina are equally rare, with the only species being another Tracheliodes and an Ectemnius from Colorado's Eocene-Oligocene Florissant Shale (Cockerell, 1906, 1910) and a putative species of Ectemnius from the Early Miocene of Germany (Meunier, 1911). Interestingly, putative species of Tracheliodes should represent half of the Crabronina known as fossils, as this group is likely basal within the subtribe. Today the genus is composed of about a dozen species occurring in the western United States, Central Europe, and Mediterranean region. The fossil record and modern distribution of Tracheliodes hint at a formerly more diverse and widespread distribution. We herein report on the occurrence of two specimens of the closely related crabronine genus Lindenius recently discovered in Dominican amber (figs. 1–3). This is the first record of a crabronine in Dominican amber and the first fossil of Lindenius.

Table 1

Amber Fossil Apoidea, Exclusive of Anthophilai0003-0082-3529-1-1-t01.gif

Figure 1–3

Photomicrographs of holotype female of Lindenius paleomystax, new species (AMNH DR-14-1091). 1. Oblique lateral habitus. 2. Facial aspect. 3. Dorsal aspect.

i0003-0082-3529-1-1-f01.jpg

Lindenius is a moderately large genus presently comprised of 60 extant species distributed throughout the Holarctic region (Pulawski, 2006). Most of these are Palearctic, with the highest diversity occurring in Mediterranean countries (Bohart and Menke, 1976). The handful of species studied construct relatively shallow nests in soil and predominantly prey on small flies or Heteroptera, though prey records also include various Hymenoptera, including Chalcidoidea, Braconidae, and ants (Hamm and Richards, 1926; Leclercq, 1954; Court, 1961; Evans, 1970; Bohart and Menke, 1976). North American species were treated in an unpublished Master's thesis (Court, 1961); Palearctic taxa were treated by de Beaumont (1956) and later by Leclercq (1989).

The age of Dominican amber has been unnecessarily confused in recent years, with age estimates ranging from the Miocene through the Eocene. In fact, critical analysis of multiple lines of evidence indicates a Neogene age, and all valid evidence supports an Early Miocene (Burdigalian) origin (e.g., Iturralde-Vinent and MacPhee, 1996). Furthermore, the inclusions themselves attest to a relatively recent age for Dominican amber in comparison with definitively more ancient resins (e.g., refer to comparisons of Dominican and Baltic amber faunas of flies and bees by Grimaldi, 1994 and Engel, 2001, respectively). Morphological terminology generally follows that of Bohart and Menke (1976).

Systematic Paleontology

  • Lindenius paleomystax, new species

  • Figures 15

  • Figure 4–5

    Line drawings of Lindenius paleomystax, new species, as preserved. 4. Face depicting clypeal margin. 5. Apical two-thirds of forewing.

    i0003-0082-3529-1-1-f04.gif

    Diagnosis

    The new species is immediately recognizable as a member of the Crabroninae owing to large cuboidal head, single submarginal cell, elongate scape, and nonemarginate eyes. It is further distinguished as a member of the subtribe Crabronina by ventrally convergent eyes, toruli positioned very low and close together on face, and ventral margin of mandibles entire (Bohart and Menke, 1976). It is placed in Lindenius by mandible with apex simple, ventral margin entire (figs. 1, 2, 4), ocellar triangle broader than high, scapal basin ecarinate, and hind wing longer than second cubital cell (submedian cell) (Bohart and Menke, 1976). With possible exception of the latter trait (which is not visible in the type material), the new species can be diagnosed by these characters in combination with the lack of an inner basal mandibular tooth (figs. 2, 4) and a clypeal margin as figured (figs. 2, 4) and described below.

    Description

    Female: Body length excluding antenna approximately 4.2 mm; head width 1.5 mm, height 0.8 mm; forewing length 3.4 mm. Color dark brown to black with brown maculations on pronotal lobe, antenna, tegula, and mandible, mandibular apex black; wing veins dark brown to black, membrane hyaline. Integument apparently imbricate. Antennal scape elongate, length approximately equal to three-fourths mandibular length, ecarinate; medial flagellomeres about as long as wide, becoming more compact apically and slightly longer basally. Clypeus short and narrow; apical margin denticulate, with three teeth lateral of medial concavity, submedial tooth broad, middle tooth longer and pointed, lateral tooth shorter and pointed (figs. 2, 4). Toruli narrowly separated, positioned low on face, meeting epistomal sulcus, scapal basin shallow and ecarinate, without medial tubercle. Gena broad behind compound eye, orbital fovea weakly present, not margined by carina (observable only in paratype), ocellar triangle broader than high, ocelli apparently all of similar size. Occipital carina present dorsally and laterally, not observable ventrally. Compound eyes large, bare, strongly convergent below, reaching clypeal margin laterally; separated from toruli by slightly less than torular diameter. Mandible simple and apically acuminate, ventral margin entire. Three segments of labial palpus visible (in paratype); three relatively long maxillary palpal segments visible (in paratype), apical segment nearly twice as long as subapical segment; pronotal collar rounded, medial notch weak (especially in paratype), strongly notched laterally. Mesoscutum simple, admedian lines, notauli, and parapsidial lines not apparent. Mesoscutellum and metanotum simple, prescutellar sulcus foveate. Postspiracular carina and epicnemial carina present, continuous; acetabular carina apparently absent, verticaulus, sternaulus, and mesopleuralus absent; hypersternaulus present, episternal groove foveate, scrobe distinct. Anteromedial section of propodeal spiralcle meeting upper arm of sideways Y-shaped carina, lower arm of carina bounds spiracle ventrally and intersects with dorsal end of weak lateral carina of propodeum; propodeal enclosure defined by transverse carina (observable in dorsal view of holotype, challenging to discern in posterior view but present), posterior longitudinal depression apparent below enclosure. Forewing basal vein distad cu-a by distance approximately equal to length of cu-a; Rs separating from Sc+R at point anterior to pterostigmal base approximately equal to length of posterior border of pterostigma within submarginal cell; marginal cell about as long as submarginal cell; apical margin of truncate marginal cell approximately equal to apical margin of submarginal cell; 1m-cu (recurrent vein) meeting posterior margin of submarginal cell near cell midpoint (fig. 5). Protrochanter widest apically, about 2.6 times as long as wide; protochantellus narrow and ringlike; profemur widest medially, about 3.5 times longer than wide; protibia widest slightly distad middle, about 4.4 times longer than wide, lightly spinose, with spur as long or nearly as long as antenna cleaner. Mesofemur expanded medially, about 2.2 times longer than wide; mesotibia somewhat expanded distad middle, about 3.7 times longer than wide, rather strongly spinose with anterior spur about twice length of posterior spur. Metafemur widest medially, about 2.7 times longer than wide; metatibia widest subapically, about 3.4 times longer than wide, spinose, with anterior spur roughly two-thirds length of posterior spur. Basitarsus about as long as combined lengths of tarsomeres II–V; tarsomeres progressively shorter except for distitarsi, which are longer than preceding tarsomeres. Pretarsal claws simple, arolia distinct. Metasoma sessile, relatively compact, roughly two-thirds as wide as mesosoma; second through fourth metasomal sterna subequal in length except third apparently slightly longer; pygidial plate flat, triangular, longer than broad, evenly narrowed, with apex truncate and punctuate throughout, somewhat more strongly so apically.

    Holotype

    Female (AMNH DR-14-1091), Dominican Republic: Early Miocene (Burdigalian) amber, specific mine unknown. Deposited in the Amber Fossil Collection, Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History.

    Paratype

    Female (AMNH DR-14-236), Dominican Republic: Early Miocene (Burdigalian) amber, northern mines. Deposited in the Amber Fossil Collection, Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History.

    Etymology

    The specific epithet is a combination of the Greek words for “ancient” (palaios) and “moustache” (mystax), a reference to the common name for the subtribe Crabronina.

    Comments

    One major difference between the fossil and its modern relatives is the lack of an inner basal mandibular tooth in the former. Although a cladistic analysis of the Crabronina is needed to be certain of its polarity, the tooth is likely a feature derived within Lindenius. It occurs in other moustache wasps (e.g., Huavea, Moniacera, some Crossocerus, and most Ectemnius) but not in any obviously closely related group. Based on this character alone, the species could plausibly be interpreted to represent an extinct lineage basal within Lindenius, outside of modern species groups as outlined by de Beaumont (1956) (see also summary in Bohart and Menke, 1976). However, such an interpretation is not congruent with the presence of a hypersternaulus, a character that suggests placement in the mesopleuralis species group of Lindenius. The correct placement of the fossil within the genus must await a broader analysis of additional characters.

    Discussion

    Like their more intensely studied relatives, the bees (Anthophila), apoid wasps are uncommon as fossils. Both have relatively comparable numbers of fossil species documented as both compressions and amber inclusions (the bees have slightly more species, but this is a bias resulting from the fact that their geological history has been the focus of work by one of us [M.S.E.] during the last decade). Unlike the bees, however, the apoid wasps have a far better representation in the Cretaceous, thereby providing greater insight into the earliest history of the Apoidea. The earliest apoid wasps are a series of plesiomorphic species classified in the family Angarosphecidae. Unfortunately, angarosphecids are defined only by plesiomorphies and thereby likely represent a grade leading to all other apoid families. This also strongly suggests that the assertion that this artificial family persisted into the Paleogene (based on Eosphecium from the Eocene of Quilchena, British Columbia; Pulawski et al., 2000) is erroneous since it is based solely on a forewing compression that preserves no derived features of any apoid family. As such, Eosphecium could just as likely represent a plesiomorphic species of Sphecidae (highly probable) or Crabronidae (less likely). This grade of plesiomorphic wasps is recorded from as long ago as the Early Cretaceous of Brazil, Europe, and Central Asia (Grimaldi and Engel, 2005). By the early epochs of the mid-Cretaceous, the families Ampulicidae and Crabronidae are definitively recorded from the Mesozoic, as evidenced by the exquisitely preserved Burmese amber fauna (Antropov, 2000b; Engel, personal obs.). Perhaps most importantly, the presence of crabronids, the most derived family of apoid wasps, immediately indicates that prior cladogenetic events in the superfamily (i.e., diversification of the families of apoid wasps) had taken place earlier in the Cretaceous. Furthermore, the occurrence of crabronids indicates that the bees, their sister group (Lomholdt, 1982; Alexander, 1992; Prentice, 1998; Melo, 1999; Grimaldi and Engel, 2005), had also already diverged by this time (Engel, 2001, 2004; Grimaldi and Engel, 2005).

    Within the Crabronidae the nominate subfamily is presently documented only from the Tertiary, with most species in amber and most being of the tribe Trypoxylini (e.g., table 1). Nel (2005) enigmatically asserted that the Trypoxylini described by him from Parisian amber (Eocene) were the earliest records of Sphecidae. Aside from the attribution to the wrong family (prior to 1993 all apoid wasps were classified as one family “Sphecidae”), these are not older than fossils of Sphecidae (in the modern strict sense) or other fossils of Crabronidae, the family to which these actually belong (see table 1).

    As mentioned previously, the moustache wasps (subtribe Crabronina) are known, like Trypoxylini, only from the Tertiary, ranging from the middle Eocene (i.e., Baltic amber species) through the Miocene (species documented herein). Prior associations of Lindenius with genera such as Entomognathus, Encopognathus, and Oxybelus (taxa outside of the Crabronina) indicate that Lindenius is likely basal or relatively basal within the subtribe, as is Tracheliodes. It is therefore interesting that species from these groups should make up most of the fossil record for the subtribe. The records of Ectemnius from Colorado and Germany are more intriguing, as the genus is apparently derived among the moustache wasps. However, characters defining Ectemnius were not preserved in these compression fossils, and attribution to the genus is exceedingly speculative, based almost entirely on general habitus (Cockerell, 1906, 1910; Meunier, 1911). As such, these records must be considered tentative and the types should be restudied before further conclusions based on these records are proposed. Overall, the sparse available records and their apparent phylogenetic position suggest an Early Tertiary (perhaps Paleocene?) origin of the Crabronina.

    With regard to Lindenius in particular, extant species of the genus are nearly restricted to the Holarctic region; one species, Lindenius montezuma (Cameron), reaches Neotropical portions of southern Mexico (Amarante, 2002). It is notable that an extinct and perhaps basal member of the genus should be found outside of its modern range and amid exceptional habitat, which allows speculation that the modern diversity in the Mediterranean region may not be attributable to an origin there. Like its relative Tracheliodes, L. paleomystax suggests a relict aspect to the distribution and habitat preference of modern Lindenius. Clearly, the natural history of Lindenius is more complicated than that revealed by Recent taxa alone. Once cladistic work on the Crabronina has been completed, more insight on questions of moustache wasp origins and historical biogeography, particularly that of Lindenius, can be gained.

    Acknowledgments

    We are grateful to David A. Grimaldi for permitting loan and study of the specimens described herein; to Eduardas Budrys for providing us with a copy of his work on the Baltic amber fauna; and to Wojciech J. Pulawski and an anonymous reviewer for their careful and valuable critiques of the manuscript. Support for this work was provided by National Science Foundation grants EF-0341724 and DEB-0542909 (to M.S.E.) and the General Research Fund of the University of Kansas Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (#2301360 to M.S.E.). This is contribution No. 3459 of the Division of Entomology, University of Kansas Natural History Museum.

    References

    1.

    B. A. Alexander 1992. An exploratory analysis of cladistic relationships within the superfamily Apoidea, with special reference to sphecid wasps (Hymenoptera). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 1:25–61. Google Scholar

    2.

    S. T. P. Amarante 2002. A synonymic catalog of the neotropical Crabronidae and Sphecidae (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Arquivos de Zoologia do Estado de São Paulo 37:11–139. Google Scholar

    3.

    A. V. Antropov 1995. A new species of the genus Trypoxylon Latreille (Hymenoptera, Sphecidae) from Dominican amber. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal 1:125–128. [In Russian, with English summary]. Google Scholar

    4.

    A. V. Antropov 2000a. A new digger wasp (Hymenoptera, Sphecidae, Pemphredoninae) from New Jersey amber. In D. Grimaldi , editor. editors. Studies on fossils in amber, with particular reference to the Cretaceous of New Jersey: 339–343. Leiden Back. viii + 498. Google Scholar

    5.

    A. V. Antropov 2000b. Digger wasps (Hymenoptera, Sphecidae) in Burmese amber. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum, Geology Series 56:159–77. Google Scholar

    6.

    A. V. Antropov and W. J. Pulawski . 1989. A new species of Pison Jurine from Baltic amber (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae). Pan-Pacific Entomologist 65:3312–318. Google Scholar

    7.

    A. V. Antropov and W. J. Pulawski . 1996. Pison antiquum, a new species from Dominican amber (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 5:16–21. Google Scholar

    8.

    R. M. Bohart and A. S. Menke . 1976. Sphecid wasps of the world: a generic revision. Berkeley University of California. ix + 695. Google Scholar

    9.

    E. Budrys 1993. Digger wasps of the subfamily Pemphredoninae (Hymenoptera, Sphecidae) from the Baltic and Taimyr amber. Acta Entomologica Lituanica 11:34–56. Google Scholar

    10.

    T. D. A. Cockerell 1906. Fossil Hymenoptera from Florissant, Colorado. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 50:233–58. Google Scholar

    11.

    T. D. A. Cockerell 1909. Descriptions of Hymenoptera from Baltic amber. Schriften der Physikalisch-ökonomischen Gesellschaft, Königsberg 50:11–20. Google Scholar

    12.

    T. D. A. Cockerell 1910. The fossil Crabronidae. Entomologist 43:60–61. Google Scholar

    13.

    T. D. A. Cockerell 1917. Descriptions of fossil insects. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 30:79–82. Google Scholar

    14.

    H. K. Court 1961. Taxonomy and biology of the genus Lindenius in North America. Master's thesis,. University of California. Davis. 72. Google Scholar

    15.

    J. de Beaumont 1956. Notes sur les Lindenius paléarctiques (Hym. Sphecid.). Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gessellschaft 29:145–185. Google Scholar

    16.

    M. S. Engel 2001. A monograph of the Baltic amber bees and evolution of the Apoidea (Hymenoptera). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 259:1–192. Google Scholar

    17.

    M. S. Engel 2004 [2005]. Geological history of the bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Revista de Tecnologia e Ambiente 10:29–33. Google Scholar

    18.

    H. E. Evans 1969. Three new Cretaceous aculeate wasps (Hymenoptera). Psyche 76:3251–261. Google Scholar

    19.

    H. E. Evans 1970. Ecological-behavioral studies of the wasps of Jackson Hole, Wyoming. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 140:451–511. Google Scholar

    20.

    H. E. Evans 1973. Cretaceous aculeate wasps from Taimyr, Siberia (Hymenoptera). Psyche 80:3166–178. Google Scholar

    21.

    D. A. Grimaldi 1994. The age of Dominican amber. In K. B. Anderson and J. C. Crelling , editors. editors. Amber, resinite, and fossil resins: 203–217. Washington, DC American Chemical Society. xvii + 297. Google Scholar

    22.

    D. Grimaldi and M. S. Engel . 2005. Evolution of the insects. Cambridge Cambridge University Press. xv + 755. Google Scholar

    23.

    A. H. Hamm and O. W. Richards . 1926. The biology of the British Crabronidae. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 74:297–331. Google Scholar

    24.

    M. A. Iturralde-Vinent and R. D. E. MacPhee . 1996. Age and paleogeographical origin of Dominican amber. Science 273:52831850–1852. Google Scholar

    25.

    J. Leclercq 1954. Monographie systématique, phylogénétique et zoogéographique des Hyménoptères Crabroniens. Liège Les Presses de “Lejeunia”. 371. 84 maps [on 63 pls.].  Google Scholar

    26.

    J. Leclercq 1989. En vue d'une monographie du genre Lindenius Lepeletier & Brullé (Hymenoptera Sphecidae Crabroninae). Bulletin de la Société Royale des Sciences de Liège 58:6419–444. Google Scholar

    27.

    O. Lomholdt 1982. On the origin of the bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Sphecidae). Entomologica Scandinavica 13:2185–190. Google Scholar

    28.

    G. A. R. Melo 1999. Phylogenetic relationships and classification of the major lineages of Apoidea (Hymenoptera), with emphasis on the crabronid wasps. Scientific Papers Natural History Museum the University of Kansas 14:1–55. Google Scholar

    29.

    F. Meunier 1911. Über einige Dipteren und eine Grabwespe (Hym.) aus der untermiocänen Braunkohle von Türnich (Rheinpreussen). Jahrbuch der Königlich Preussischen Geologischen Landesanstalt 30:1538–539. Google Scholar

    30.

    A. Nel 2005. Oldest representatives of the Sphecidae: Trypoxylini in the Early Eocene French amber (Insecta: Hymenoptera). Comptes Rendus Palevol 4:1–217–24. Google Scholar

    31.

    P. G. Nemkov 1988. New genus of digger wasp from Baltic amber. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal 1988:2119–121. [In Russian]. Google Scholar

    32.

    M. Ohl 2003. The first fossil representative of the wasp genus Dolichurus, with a review of fossil Ampulicidae (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 77:4332–342. Google Scholar

    33.

    M. A. Prentice 1998. The comparative morphology and phylogeny of Apoid wasps (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) [2 vols.]. Ph.D. dissertation,. University of California. Berkeley. xi + 1439. Google Scholar

    34.

    M. A. Prentice and G. O. Poinar Jr . 1993. Three species of Trypoxylon Latreille from Dominican amber (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 66:3280–291. Google Scholar

    35.

    W. J. Pulawski 2006. Catalog of Sphecidae sensu lato ( =  Apoidea excluding Apidae). Available at (internet link valid as of 17 February 2006):  http://www.calacademy.org/research/entomology/Entomology_Resources/Hymenoptera/sphecidae/Genera_and_species_PDF/introduction.htmGoogle Scholar

    36.

    W. J. Pulawski, A. P. Rasnitsyn, D. J. Brothers, and S. B. Archibald . 2000. New genera of Angarosphecinae: Cretosphecium from Early Cretaceous of Mongolia and Eosphecium from Early Eocene of Canada (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 9:134–40. Google Scholar

    37.

    T. Schlüter 1978. Zur Systematik und Palökologie harzkonservierter Arthropoda einer Taphozönose aus dem Cenomanium von NW-Frankreich. Berliner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, Reihe A, Geologie und Paläontologie 9:1–150. Google Scholar

    38.

    M. Sorg 1986. Grabwespen der Gattung Passaloecus aus fossilen Harzen (Hymenoptera, Sphecoidea, Pemphredoninae). Passaloecus microceras n. sp., baltischer Bernstein, oberes Eozän. Passaloecus munax n. sp., bitterfelder Bernstein, unteres Miozän. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 60:3–4277–284. Google Scholar

    39.

    W. Weitschat 1997. Bitterfelder Bernstein – Ein eozäner Bernstein auf miozäner Lagerstätte. Metalla, Bochum 66:71–84. Google Scholar
    DANIEL J BENNETT and MICHAEL S ENGEL "A New Moustache Wasp in Dominican Amber, with an Account of Apoid Wasp Evolution Emphasizing Crabroninae (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae)," American Museum Novitates 2006(3529), 1-10, (8 September 2006). https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0082(2006)3529[1:ANMWID]2.0.CO;2
    Published: 8 September 2006
    Back to Top